Death of Diana - The Camera Problem

I've not conducted any dedicated research or investigation into the death of Princess Diana. However, even from my very limited, indirect knowledge of the car's journey and crash, I've seen enough to make me uncertain as to whether the event was 'an accident' or not.

What I cannot understand, is why, whenever I have seen or heard someone speaking on TV or radio, saying that it was clearly 'an accident,' and implying that anyone who thinks otherwise is irrational and/or less morally sound than they are -

this type of individual is not simply asked about the camera problem.

This problem has been adroitly summarised by David Icke, in his book 'The Biggest Secret':

'There are 17 traffic cameras on the route between the Ritz and the Pont L'Alma, including those inside the tunnel itself. If they had been working that night there would have been no mystery, because you could play back the whole event on your television set. One camera looks down on the entrance to the tunnel and would have recorded any Fiat Uno or men on motorbikes with flashing lights. But that camera, like all the others, was switched off at the crucial moment. Never before in Paris had the whole system malfunctioned at the same time, and the police refuse to explain what happened. The system runs on an independent power supply and it is controlled by the police and, ultimately, by the French Intelligence agencies, because the cameras are there to monitor far more than just traffic problems. At the same time as the camera system failed all the police communication frequencies in central Paris also went off...'

Can any of the proponents of the 'accident' theory explain

Why?

 

Death of Princess Diana Resource Page